The article on teenage violence didnt in reality attract my attention , the way mike males started his dissertation argument didnt make me interested in interpreting the story. I think that the article was very(prenominal) boring and I couldnt tell in which direction he was going, the language that he used alot of the words I did non understand. The plot in this article was to prove how teenagers ar not becoming to a greater extent vehement even with the shootings and incidents that have been contingency in high schoolhouses across the country. I do not condescend his opinion because thetstatistics he was using were about schools in the suburbs. If the compose wouldve did to a greater extent inquiry on school within cities with high population he wouldve seen that incidents occurs in schools day-by-day such as, fighting ,gang fights , stabbing and and so forth I believe that teenagers are just as violent if not even more violent than vaingloriouss, more a dult incidents are inform because of the extreme things that were done.
Because when teenagers are violent, if less thann 5 good deal were affected its really not reported in the news,but when a massacre occurs whether in the suburbs or in the metropolis its reported because of the extreme situation that happened not because its out of date. In certainty mike males failed to convince me that teenagers are not becoming more violent, I believe are still violent and that the poesy are not decreasing, in this day and age its been as its ever so been. The only difference is that it that because its some common in cities its not reported as much,unlike the s! uburbs where its rare and when it does happen its an very rare and extreme incident.If you want to get a sufficient essay, modulate it on our website: BestEssayCheap.com
If you want to get a full essay, visit our page: cheap essay
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.